http://www.artstyles.org/coptic-christian/
In recent years, the situation of Copts in the Islamic Countries, dominated or by Fundamentalist Groups, while the State is Laic, or by the Sharjah as legislative pillar of the statement, has worsened considerably Copts today form a strong Diaspora in North America, Europe and Australia, number approx 1.5 millions.
Again we are facing an additional Islamic attach against Copts, and excluding the usual newspaper articles, no one has taken a clear position. It would seem President Mubarak, which not tolerate the fundamentalist follies has sent soldiers to guard churches. At the same time the Government clarified the attack was a revenge for the rape of a girl by a Christian man. Pacifists and their flattery of priests, communists and socialists have not even deigned to make a protest in front of the Egyptian embassy.
Maybe because they are too focused on trying to bring down the Conservative government and therefore the deaths of some poor Coptic, are not useful for their purposes. Not even the “intellectuals”, those pundits with the “I” capitalized, have not bothered with the terrible question that a few lines of circumstance. The constant threat against Coptic is part of a strategy to eliminate during centuries of Islam, all traces of Christianity in Africa, after a conquest that lasted nearly a millennium. The silence reign absolute when Christians are massacred and brutalized by the representatives of the so-called “religion of peace”: Islam.
Christians who do not want to live under Islamic law are not oversimplifying. Rather, they are accepting to leave. Every year thousands of Copts convert to Islam; like in the past, convert or die. That’s is the religion of dialogue. Copts today form a strong Diaspora in North America, Europe and Australia, number approx 1.5 millions But simply Copts are just Egyptians, then is just question of faith and not an issue of revenge. Vengeance is just a mounted case. We are not interested in the political relationship with Egyptian Government in a function to have a solid partner in that area. Political Relationship should be programmed in a sincere cooperation and protection of minorities; otherwise the relationship is founded only in pure cynicism.
But for a Nation, which proclaims the importance of the Freedom, this is just a pure failure, which should be added to the already vast collection of hazardous pragmatisms. An Empire has a duty to defend its principles everywhere and if the United States and his Allies no longer feel this responsibility, then it means that they will face a nemesis.